Stenting for small coronary vessels: a contestable winner.

نویسندگان

  • A Kastrati
  • H Schühlen
  • A Schömig
چکیده

Stents were initially used to manage or prevent acute vessel closure after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). The first direct randomized comparison with respect to restenosis showed the superiority of stenting to PTCA for de novo lesions situated in native vessels 3 mm or larger (1,2). In these trials, stenting was associated with a 25% to 30% reduction of restenosis as compared to PTCA (1,2). This represented the first of a series of battles won by stenting regarding restenosis. Trials that followed showed better results after stenting than after PTCA for bypass graft lesions (3), lesions situated in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (4), restenotic lesions (5), chronic occlusions (6) and in patients with acute myocardial infarction (7). Accordingly, stent placement was unanimously indicated for the treatment of de novo or restenotic lesions situated in large vessels ( 3 mm in size).

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Randomized Trial Comparing Stenting With Balloon Angioplasty in Small Vessels in Patients With Symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease

Background—More than 30% of the lesions currently treated with interventional approaches are situated in vessels smaller in size than those representing an established indication for stenting. The objective of this randomized trial was to assess whether compared with PTCA, stenting of small coronary vessels is associated with a reduction of restenosis. Methods and Results—Patients with symptoma...

متن کامل

Is bare-metal stenting superior to balloon angioplasty for small vessel coronary artery disease? Evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

AIMS To compare, by meta-analytical techniques, the clinical impact of bare-metal stenting vs. balloon angioplasty for the treatment of lesions in small coronary arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS We included trials with random allocation and prospective comparison of angioplasty vs. stenting, reference vessel diameter<3 mm, and follow-up>or=6 months. Random effect odds ratios (OR) for death, myoc...

متن کامل

Coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in small vessels: a meta-analysis from 11 randomized studies.

OBJECTIVES A meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials was done to compare stenting versus balloon angioplasty (BA) in small coronary vessels. BACKGROUND Randomized studies on coronary stenting (CS) in small vessels have yielded controversial results. METHODS Eleven randomized trials on CS versus BA in small vessels, including angiographic re-evaluation at six months, were analyzed. RESULTS T...

متن کامل

Multislice Computed Tomography After Left Main Drug-Eluting Stenting

Coronary stenting has become the dominant therapy for patients referred for coronary revascularization. Because of their documented efficacy in reducing instent restenosis (ISR),1–3 drug-eluting stents (DES) are used for this purpose in most percutaneous revascularization procedures. Although intended primarily for use in native, de novo stenoses in coronary vessels 2.5 to 3.5 mm in diameter, D...

متن کامل

Coronary artery stenting in unstable angina pectoris: a comparison with stable angina pectoris.

OBJECTIVE To compare early complication rates in unselected cases of coronary artery stenting in patients with stable v unstable angina. SETTING Tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS 390 patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP) and 306 with unstable angina (UAP). Patients treated for acute myocardial infarction (primary angioplasty) or cardiogenic shock were excluded. INTERVENTIONS 268 cor...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

دوره 38 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001